Ralph Nader -- perhaps a soupçon of all three

Ralph Nader:

Profoundly ignorant.

Profoundly cynical.

Profoundly arrogant.

That is all.

And no, still haven't forgiven him for this.

A dime's worth of difference

I don't subscribe to the notion, but if you believe in the Nadarite (or, perhaps, Paulite) view of the two parties, then this is an absolutely must-read post from Digby.  In it, that partisan apologist for the Democratic party, Noam Chomsky, explains that even a small difference between the two parties makes a huge difference -- for civil rights, for the environment, for a modicum of economic justice -- over time.

About that dime?  Well, as Einstein was said to have replied when asked to name the greatest invention of mankind, "compound interest."

Pity the forests

Nothing is more awesome to behold than Ralph Nader's ego. I'm sure his prose is just as formidable.

Ralph Nader does the funky chicken

The long, slow descent of Ralph Nader's reputation has apparently not yet hit rock-bottom.

''There's only one thing different about Barack Obama when it comes to being a Democratic presidential candidate. He's half African-American,'' Nader said. ''Whether that will make any difference, I don't know. I haven't heard him have a strong crackdown on economic exploitation in the ghettos. Payday loans, predatory lending, asbestos, lead. What's keeping him from doing that? Is it because he wants to talk white? He doesn't want to appear like Jesse Jackson?''

When asked if Obama does try to ''talk white,'' Nader replied, ''Of course.'' He also said that Obama doesn't want to appear to be ''another politically threatening African-American politician.''

''He wants to appeal to white guilt,'' Nader said. ''You appeal to white guilt not by coming on as black is beautiful, black is powerful. Basically he's coming on as someone who is not going to threaten the white power structure, whether it's corporate or whether it's simply oligarchic. And they love it. Whites just eat it up.''

Obama responds with the equivalent of a sigh:

Obama said Nader hadn't been paying attention because he has discussed predatory lending, housing foreclosures and similar economic issues throughout his campaign.

''I think it's a shame because if you look at his legacy in terms of consumer protections, it's an extraordinary one. But at this point, he's somebody who's trying to get attention and whose campaign hasn't gotten any traction,'' Obama said.

Keep talking, Ralph. Just keep talking.

The Rapture

Reed Hunt's take on Nader is interesting. In his view (I think -- Hunt's not the clearest of writers), Nader believes two seemingly contradictory things: that the Democratic candidates are not ideologically any purer than the Republican and that the Republican candidate is sufficiently bad enough that he'll bring on Armageddon that much sooner (see George W. Bush), at which point everyone will finally realize that Ralph was right all along.

About something.

Hunt's surely right about one thing: Nader needs help, not publicity.