Save the Globe, Save the World
On the day news outlets are reporting the imminent demise of The Boston Globe because The New York Times couldn't wring enough
Here, by the way, is an old list of the Globe's greatest hits. Does the Salzburger family want their legacy to be the closing of newspapers?Speaking Tuesday in Washington at the Reuters Global Financial Regulation meeting, the day after the business magazine Portfolio closed, Mary L. Schapiro, the chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, suggested that because federal regulators cannot be everywhere at once, experienced reporters constitute additional critical boots on the ground.
“Financial journalists have in many cases been the sources of some really important enforcement cases and really important discovery of practices and products that regulators should be profoundly concerned about,” said Ms. Schapiro. “But for journalists having been dogged and determined and really pursuing some of these things, they might not be known to the regulators or they might not be known for a long time.”
A current accounting of the news business — grim and grimmer by the day — suggests that there may be a subsequent bear market in accountability as well. The day before she spoke, the Audit Bureau of Circulations revealed that for the six months ended March 31, newspapers, which employ the vast share of paid watchdogs, were down an average of 7 percent in circulation from the previous year, a steepening decline that foretells additional layoffs in a business that has already had its share.
On Friday, it was announced that The Washington Post lost $53.8 million in the first quarter of the year, and perhaps more ominously, that revenue in its online properties dropped 8 percent.
Thinking about a federal government in full frolic engorged by stimulus money without a robust Washington Post is not a pleasant prospect.
Labels: future of newspapers
1 Comments:
And, of course, any article on newspapers must have the requisite typographical error and subsequent correction:
This article incorrectly spells the name of the family which owns the New York Times. The correct spelling is Sulzberger. We regret the error.But you are not alone, no less than the NY Times itself has mangled the name of its owners:
CJR: Nuw Yerk Tumes (The linked article is well worth the read as a 2006 preview of current events.)
And then the Times does it again in their correction. (See the second comment.) Double dog irony!
Post a Comment
<< Home