Sunday, October 26, 2008

Coordinated ugliness

Historians will look back on this election and conclude that was the most racially divisive in a generation. Not so much about Obama's negritude, though there's plenty of that, but rather the pervasive anti-Muslim sentiment that would have made us all blush on 9-12-01. "Obsession" is an apt name.

A New York-based organization has sent copies of a movie about Islamist extremism to more than 28 million houses and religious institutions in presidential election battleground states over the past several weeks.

The 60-minute documentary-style production, "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West," includes images of terrorist attacks from around the world, historic footage of Nazi rallies and modern-day scenes of Muslim children reciting poetry that celebrates suicide bombings. The costs of producing and distributing the film, through mass mailings and newspaper inserts -- an effort that one Muslim advocacy group estimates at $50 million -- were paid by the Clarion Fund, a nonprofit group that says it is seeking "to educate Americans about issues of national security to influence voters."

Members of several Muslim groups have condemned the film, saying that it is inflammatory and that it could incite violence against them.

"It's a mind-boggling massive campaign. When you send material like this almost exclusively to presidential swing states that sends a message that you are trying to influence the election," said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations. "It's inappropriate as a nonprofit for the Clarion Fund to do."

Of course, the McCain campaign "has not coordinated with Clarion," but finds nothing in the film with which to disagree.


Labels: ,

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I really recommend giving Obsession a chance, and I disagree that it is meant to appeal to anti-Muslim sentiments. The only people who say that are those who haven't actually seen it.

The film is adamantly not anti-Muslim, and you can take it from me because I have worked with the film distributors. The Wikipedia entry contains the disclaimer at the beginning of the movie, so you can see that for yourself now.

10:57 AM  
Blogger John said...

Sure, Chris, I can take it from you since you have "worked with the distributors?" No, I haven't seen it, but I have certainly read about it. Here's The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg:

The tragedy of "Obsession" is not that it is wrong; the tragedy is that it takes a serious issue, and a serious threat -- that of Islamism -- and makes it into a cartoon. Its central argument is that the "Islamofascism" of today is not only the equivalent of Nazism, but worse than Nazism. This is quite a thing for a Jewish organization to argue. One of the featured speakers in "Obsession" is a self-described "former PLO terrorist" named Walid Shoebat, who argues on film that a "secular dogma like Nazism is less dangerous than Islamofascism is today."

This is lunacy, of course. Islamism isn't Nazism. It's bad enough without being labeled Nazism. Martin Gilbert, the biographer of Churchill, shows up in the film as well, and doesn't cover himself in glory: "History has an unfortunate habit of always repeating itself," he says. Always? Does this mean that the Arabs are right now constructing death camps for the Jewish citizens of Israel?

Just unbelievable, but the most unbelievable part of the "Obsession" campaign is its timing: What does this film have to do with Barack Obama? The film is meant to suggest that Obama will provide aid and comfort to Islamism, or is an Islamist himself. There is not one shred of proof on this planet that Barack Obama is anything other than an Israel-supporting Christian. Yes, he went to party with Rashid Khalidi. So did I. Does that make me a member of Hezbollah?

3:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi John, I just meant to say I am very familiar with the film.

I am glad that Goldberg takes radical Islam seriously, but I think he is wrong in his estimation of the movie itself. After all, he admits he's only seen the 12-minute version.

I'm not sure if I agree with Shoebat, but certainly if the Islamofascists could organize as well as the Nazis did, the loss of life could certainly be comparable.

And the Nazi references are not from thin air -- as the movie shows, political cartoonists from anti-Israel papers in Arab and Muslim countries sometimes appropriate images from Nazi anti-Jewish cartoons.

And Goldberg's mention of Obama is sort of a non sequitur. The movie was made before he got the nomination and the "timing" is because there is an election coming up and radical Islam is always a subject that should be considered. No more, no less.

1:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com Site Meter