Thursday, May 18, 2006

Arlen Specter admits he's no defender of the Constitution

Christ, didn't he take an oath?

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Senate committee approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage Thursday, after a shouting match that ended when one Democrat strode out and the Republican chairman bid him ''good riddance.''

''I don't need to be lectured by you. You are no more a protector of the Constitution than am I,'' Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., shouted after Sen. Russ Feingold declared his opposition to the amendment, his affinity for the Constitution and his intention to leave the meeting.

''If you want to leave, good riddance,'' Specter finished.

''I've enjoyed your lecture, too, Mr. Chairman,'' replied Feingold, D-Wis., who is considering a run for president in 2008. ''See ya.''

Amid increasing partisan tension over President Bush's judicial nominees and domestic wiretapping, the panel voted along party lines to send the constitutional amendment -- which would prohibit states from recognizing same-sex marriages -- to the full Senate, where it stands little chance of passing.

Democrats complained that bringing up the amendment is a purely political move designed to appeal to the GOP's conservative base in this year of midterm elections. Under the domed ceiling of the ornate and historic President's Room off the Senate floor, senators voted 10-8 to send the measure forward. Not all those who voted ''yes'' support the amendment, however. Specter said he is ''totally opposed'' to it, but felt it deserved a debate in the Senate.

''Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman,'' reads the measure, which would require approval by two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states.

''Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman,'' it says.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has scheduled a vote on the proposed amendment the week of June 5.


Astonishing. We have an Executive branch run Constitutionally amuck and this is what Specter decides needs a thorough "debate."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com Site Meter