First Limbo. Now this?
Apologies for taking a short break from the usual snark-filled cynical posts about our nation's political "leadership," and not to get all theological on your ass, Dear Reader, but this stuff is fascinatin'.
Ah, the synapses fire and suddenly I'm transported back 25 years, with memories of long afternoons reading Borges sweeping over the brain like the tides. From "Three Versions of Judas."
Obviously, Vatican scholars are not thinking far enough out of the box.
Via Crooked Timber's Chris Bertram.
Mgr Brandmuller told fellow scholars it was time for a “re-reading” of the Judas story. He is supported by Vittorio Messori, a prominent Catholic writer close to both Pope Benedict XVI and the late John Paul II.
Signor Messori said that the rehabilitation of Judas would “resolve the problem of an apparent lack of mercy by Jesus toward one of his closest collaborators”.
Ah, the synapses fire and suddenly I'm transported back 25 years, with memories of long afternoons reading Borges sweeping over the brain like the tides. From "Three Versions of Judas."
To affirm that he was a man and that he was incapable of sin contains a contradiction; the attributes of impeccabilitas and of humanitas are not compatible. Kemnitz admits that the Redeemer could feel fatigue, cold, confusion, hunger and thirst; it is reasonable to admit that he could also sin and be damned. The famous text "He will sprout like a root in a dry soil; there is not good mien to him, nor beauty; despised of men and the least of them; a man of sorrow, and experienced in heartbreaks" (Isaiah 53:2-3) is for many people a forecast of the Crucified in the hour of his death; for some (as for instance, Hans Lassen Martensen), it is a refutation of the beauty which the vulgar consensus attributes to Christ; for Runeberg, it is a precise prophecy, not of one moment, but of all the atrocious future, in time and eternity, of the Word made flesh. God became a man completely, a man to the point of infamy, a man to the point of being reprehensible - all the way to the abyss. In order to save us, He could have chosen any of the destinies which together weave the uncertain web of history; He could have been Alexander, or Pythagoras, or Rurik, or Jesus; He chose an infamous destiny: He was Judas.
Obviously, Vatican scholars are not thinking far enough out of the box.
Via Crooked Timber's Chris Bertram.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home