Saturday, November 19, 2005

Waterboarding our way into Iraq

If this is true, then lies told to please his interrogators -- and to stop being tortured -- were then used as evidence central to the case the administration built to convince the nation that we needed to invade Iraq.

According to CIA sources, Ibn al Shaykh al Libbi, after two weeks of enhanced interrogation, made statements that were designed to tell the interrogators what they wanted to hear. Sources say Al Libbi had been subjected to each of the progressively harsher techniques in turn and finally broke after being water boarded and then left to stand naked in his cold cell overnight where he was doused with cold water at regular intervals.

His statements became part of the basis for the Bush administration claims that Iraq trained al Qaeda members to use biochemical weapons. Sources tell ABC that it was later established that al Libbi had no knowledge of such training or weapons and fabricated the statements because he was terrified of further harsh treatment.

"This is the problem with using the waterboard. They get so desperate that they begin telling you what they think you want to hear," one source said.

However, sources said, al Libbi does not appear to have sought to intentionally misinform investigators, as at least one account has stated. The distinction in this murky world is nonetheless an important one. Al Libbi sought to please his investigators, not lead them down a false path, two sources with firsthand knowledge of the statements said.

It is Dick Cheney's world -- "the dark side" -- we are all, quite literally, just living in it. And torture begets more and more torture.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com Site Meter