Upheavals at Langley

Disaffection with the Bush administration and its partisan hacks continues at the CIA.

Current and retired senior managers have criticized Goss, former chairman of the House intelligence committee, for not interacting with senior managers and for giving Murray too much authority over day-to-day operations. Murray was Goss's chief of staff on the intelligence committee.

Transitions between CIA directors are often unsettling for career officers. Goss's arrival has been especially tense because he brought with him four former members of the intelligence committee known widely on the Hill and within the agency for their abrasive management style and for their criticism of the agency's clandestine services in a committee report.

Three are former mid-level CIA officials who left the agency disgruntled, according to former colleagues. The fourth, Murray, who also worked at the Justice Department, has a reputation for being highly partisan. When senior managers have gone to Goss to complain about his staff actions, one CIA officer said, Goss has told them: "Talk to my chief of staff. I don't do personnel."

The overall effect, said one former senior CIA official, who has kept up his contacts in the Directorate of Operations, "is that Goss doesn't seem engaged at all."

.
With a gusto typical of Bush administration appointees, Goss and his advisers are encouraging an exodus of senior intelligence experts at a time when we need to bolster our intelligence to battle Islamic fundamentalist terrorists.

But, of course, according to David Brooks, such intelligence experts should just shut up and take it.

Now that he's been returned to office, President Bush is going to have to differentiate between his opponents and his enemies. His opponents are found in the Democratic Party. His enemies are in certain offices of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Over the past several months, as much of official Washington looked on wide-eyed and agog, many in the C.I.A. bureaucracy have waged an unabashed effort to undermine the current administration.

.
Yes, David. Better these rebellious critics of Dear Leader should be silent as they watch an administration manipulate intelligence, turn the CIA into yet another arm of the Republican party, and pursue policies that are doing anything but destroying fundamentalist terrorists. Good idea.