The "agreeable" Dr. Rice
While it is certainly no match for the NY Post's "Headless Body Found in Topless Bar," this New York Times headline is unmatched in its irony and understatedness.
Dr. Rice demands an opportunity to rebut Clarke's sworn testimony, but finds it perhaps "disagreeable" to do so under oath and in public. Wonder why.
And as the SS Condoleeza finds "agreeable" the idea of a very private opportunity to stick a shiv into Clarke, Dr. Frist has no compunction in declassifying Clarke's 2002 classified testimony to the Senate. This should further endear the intelligence community to the GOP leadership.
As as dailyKos notes, Frist is willing to potentially compromise national security even though he doesn't know what's in the classified testimony.
More evidence that when it comes to character, national security, and building a stronger, safer America, President Bush and GOP leadership stand tall.
Meanwhile, the Center for American Progress looks at Clarke's claims and substantiates them.
Dr. Rice demands an opportunity to rebut Clarke's sworn testimony, but finds it perhaps "disagreeable" to do so under oath and in public. Wonder why.
And as the SS Condoleeza finds "agreeable" the idea of a very private opportunity to stick a shiv into Clarke, Dr. Frist has no compunction in declassifying Clarke's 2002 classified testimony to the Senate. This should further endear the intelligence community to the GOP leadership.
As as dailyKos notes, Frist is willing to potentially compromise national security even though he doesn't know what's in the classified testimony.
More evidence that when it comes to character, national security, and building a stronger, safer America, President Bush and GOP leadership stand tall.
Meanwhile, the Center for American Progress looks at Clarke's claims and substantiates them.
posted by John at 4:04 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home